Difference between revisions of "Sonic hacks"
From Sonic Retro
MainMemory (talk | contribs) (just some thoughts) |
(Page deletion?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, the DPL error for the SADX hacks was because I moved [[Shadow Adventure]] from '''Category:Sonic Adventure DX Hacks''' to '''Category:Sonic Adventure DX: Director's Cut Hacks''' where [[Sonic Adventure RDX]] was. Although, I think that section should be called "Personal Computer" instead of "Nintendo GameCube", as they aren't actually hacks for the Gamecube. Of course, if this page is supposed to be deleted, then none of this matters anyway. [[User:MainMemory|MainMemory]] 13:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | So, the DPL error for the SADX hacks was because I moved [[Shadow Adventure]] from '''Category:Sonic Adventure DX Hacks''' to '''Category:Sonic Adventure DX: Director's Cut Hacks''' where [[Sonic Adventure RDX]] was. Although, I think that section should be called "Personal Computer" instead of "Nintendo GameCube", as they aren't actually hacks for the Gamecube. Of course, if this page is supposed to be deleted, then none of this matters anyway. [[User:MainMemory|MainMemory]] 13:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : On that note, is this page gonna be deleted or not? It's been marked for deletion for almost a month, so I assume there's some reason it hasn't been deleted already, but then if there is the deletion template should be removed from it. --[[User:Shobiz|Shobiz]] 14:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:08, 27 May 2010
So, the DPL error for the SADX hacks was because I moved Shadow Adventure from Category:Sonic Adventure DX Hacks to Category:Sonic Adventure DX: Director's Cut Hacks where Sonic Adventure RDX was. Although, I think that section should be called "Personal Computer" instead of "Nintendo GameCube", as they aren't actually hacks for the Gamecube. Of course, if this page is supposed to be deleted, then none of this matters anyway. MainMemory 13:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- On that note, is this page gonna be deleted or not? It's been marked for deletion for almost a month, so I assume there's some reason it hasn't been deleted already, but then if there is the deletion template should be removed from it. --Shobiz 14:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC)