Difference between revisions of "Sonic Robo Blast 2"
From Sonic Retro
(→Download) |
Dark Warrior (talk | contribs) (New section: Cleanup. Badly needed.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is there a specific reason this article doesn't have any downloads for the game, or were people just lazy when making this article? It would make sense to have an archive of various released versions of the game to be on the wiki, as we'd do with hacks or other fan games. --[[User:Tweaker|Tweaker]] 21:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | Is there a specific reason this article doesn't have any downloads for the game, or were people just lazy when making this article? It would make sense to have an archive of various released versions of the game to be on the wiki, as we'd do with hacks or other fan games. --[[User:Tweaker|Tweaker]] 21:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:When I first saw this article, it was almost empty. I had pointed it out in #srb2fun and sudden of all the people from there had filled the article with information. It didn't change much since then, so I think that this article was mainly edited by people from SRB2, and they probably thought that a link to the main page was enough. In fact, it has many terms from that community - e.g. SRB2MB (SRB2 Message Board). This article doesn't just need downloads, it actually needs a general clean up. --[[User:Sik|Sik]] 21:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | :When I first saw this article, it was almost empty. I had pointed it out in #srb2fun and sudden of all the people from there had filled the article with information. It didn't change much since then, so I think that this article was mainly edited by people from SRB2, and they probably thought that a link to the main page was enough. In fact, it has many terms from that community - e.g. SRB2MB (SRB2 Message Board). This article doesn't just need downloads, it actually needs a general clean up. --[[User:Sik|Sik]] 21:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Cleanup. Badly needed. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article is a mess. Oh, I'm sure it's not the only one, but it happened to be the one I noticed. (Yes, probably because I'd be very biased about this. So let's just get that out of the way.) I filled it in with more ''relevant'' information, and replaced the list of unlinked addons with a list of good ones here: http://www.srb2.org/mb/viewtopic.php?t=14996 . Now, what I did is by no means a good cleaning job. A lot of the stuff here should probably be re-summarized, and fancruft kept off the page. I don't know how Retro's Wiki works in terms of this kind of thing, or who likes to do what, etc etc etc. I'd dedicate more time to fixing this article, if I weren't bust actually developing 1.1. >_> So I'm just asking anyone who cares to actually make this a good article. It really is bad. :E [[User:Dark Warrior|Dark Warrior]] 09:53, 28 January 2009 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 11:53, 28 January 2009
Download
Is there a specific reason this article doesn't have any downloads for the game, or were people just lazy when making this article? It would make sense to have an archive of various released versions of the game to be on the wiki, as we'd do with hacks or other fan games. --Tweaker 21:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- When I first saw this article, it was almost empty. I had pointed it out in #srb2fun and sudden of all the people from there had filled the article with information. It didn't change much since then, so I think that this article was mainly edited by people from SRB2, and they probably thought that a link to the main page was enough. In fact, it has many terms from that community - e.g. SRB2MB (SRB2 Message Board). This article doesn't just need downloads, it actually needs a general clean up. --Sik 21:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Cleanup. Badly needed.
This article is a mess. Oh, I'm sure it's not the only one, but it happened to be the one I noticed. (Yes, probably because I'd be very biased about this. So let's just get that out of the way.) I filled it in with more relevant information, and replaced the list of unlinked addons with a list of good ones here: http://www.srb2.org/mb/viewtopic.php?t=14996 . Now, what I did is by no means a good cleaning job. A lot of the stuff here should probably be re-summarized, and fancruft kept off the page. I don't know how Retro's Wiki works in terms of this kind of thing, or who likes to do what, etc etc etc. I'd dedicate more time to fixing this article, if I weren't bust actually developing 1.1. >_> So I'm just asking anyone who cares to actually make this a good article. It really is bad. :E Dark Warrior 09:53, 28 January 2009 (CST)