Difference between revisions of "Level themes"
From Sonic Retro
(→Umm) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Why is there this one large consolidated article, as well as [[:Category:Sonic_Cliches|small separate articles]] which appear to be more updated? --[[User:Shobiz|Shobiz]] 12:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | Why is there this one large consolidated article, as well as [[:Category:Sonic_Cliches|small separate articles]] which appear to be more updated? --[[User:Shobiz|Shobiz]] 12:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:My guess is that it started as the larger article, I think the larger article should be made smaller, probably just have a list of the Sonic cliche's and link to the smaller articles. Maybe a small write-up. That way the smaller, yet more detailed articles can be just as relevant.--[[User:MathUser|MathUser]] 13:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | :My guess is that it started as the larger article, I think the larger article should be made smaller, probably just have a list of the Sonic cliche's and link to the smaller articles. Maybe a small write-up. That way the smaller, yet more detailed articles can be just as relevant.--[[User:MathUser|MathUser]] 13:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Personally, I'm more in favour of merging back the small articles into this main one and just changing those to redirects - I don't think the articles have enough content to warrant their own separate pages, cos even all 10 combined are only like around 9 KB. --[[User:Shobiz|Shobiz]] 14:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:27, 7 September 2008
How about the GG and SMS games? The underground chile for example first appeared in sonic 2 gg, underground zone!
Umm
Why is there this one large consolidated article, as well as small separate articles which appear to be more updated? --Shobiz 12:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- My guess is that it started as the larger article, I think the larger article should be made smaller, probably just have a list of the Sonic cliche's and link to the smaller articles. Maybe a small write-up. That way the smaller, yet more detailed articles can be just as relevant.--MathUser 13:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Personally, I'm more in favour of merging back the small articles into this main one and just changing those to redirects - I don't think the articles have enough content to warrant their own separate pages, cos even all 10 combined are only like around 9 KB. --Shobiz 14:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)