Difference between revisions of "Lacey Chabert"
From Sonic Retro
(FFS) |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Nonsense articles != borderline pornography (all right maybe not, but you get my point)! I fully agree with her, and brought the point up on IRC as well the day they were uploaded. I'm not going to revert back cos I don't want to start a revert war, but I have serious reservations with the presence of those pictures on this article. --[[User:Shobiz|Shobiz]] 13:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | ::Nonsense articles != borderline pornography (all right maybe not, but you get my point)! I fully agree with her, and brought the point up on IRC as well the day they were uploaded. I'm not going to revert back cos I don't want to start a revert war, but I have serious reservations with the presence of those pictures on this article. --[[User:Shobiz|Shobiz]] 13:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Really, tons of pictures aren't needed, only one is needed, this isn't the Lacey Chabert Fan Club. [[User:SOTI|SOTI]] 13:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:26, 13 October 2008
Seriously
Are all these pictures REALLY necessary? Some of them aren't appropriate for this site in my opinion. All we need to know is that she voices Princess Elise, not for her article to be eye candy for the public. --ソニックエンジェル948 06:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yes, they are very neccessary. Don't worry about them being inappropriate, theres only 500 views, and a voice actor for a single game isn't gonna get many more clicks. Also, Retro don't seem to mind a silly article or two. Note how the Humans article actually describes people as strange furless mammals. And several user pages are filled with nonsensical comments also.--MathUser 13:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Nonsense articles != borderline pornography (all right maybe not, but you get my point)! I fully agree with her, and brought the point up on IRC as well the day they were uploaded. I'm not going to revert back cos I don't want to start a revert war, but I have serious reservations with the presence of those pictures on this article. --Shobiz 13:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Really, tons of pictures aren't needed, only one is needed, this isn't the Lacey Chabert Fan Club. SOTI 13:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)