Difference between revisions of "David The Lurker"
From Sonic Retro
(→Why did you revert my edit on that category) |
m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It was descriptive of why those organizations weren't on real life because no body co-founded them yet.--[[User:Brandondorf9999|Brandondorf9999]] 16:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC) | It was descriptive of why those organizations weren't on real life because no body co-founded them yet.--[[User:Brandondorf9999|Brandondorf9999]] 16:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I reverted it because the sentence you wrote made absolutely no sense, to be honest. Even now, the sentence you wrote above me is not...completely grammatically correct? Not to mention flow and word choice and...sigh. Also, not to be rude, but you need to stop adding "trivia" sections to the wiki pages. I know there are pages on here that have "trivia" sections, but most of those are old and refer to a stylistic choice that isn't as professional as this wiki should be trying to be. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Any information that could be applied to a "trivia" section should instead be in the article proper, but in such a way that it actually flows and makes sense with the information around it. Then there's the question of whether or not the "trivia" is actually interesting enough to be mentioned. And if it's something that just can't be placed anywhere else, like with some of the random facts that are on the character pages, a "Miscellaneous" section seems slightly more professional. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I don't want to kill your enthusiasm, because I know you're excited about doing whatever it is you're doing here. But maybe you should calm down just a bit and give some more thought as to what you're writing. [[User:David The Lurker|David The Lurker]] 17:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Oh and I'm supposed to be a member of Members instead of being just stuck on pending membership. Would you change my status to either like Oldbie or Members so that I can upload files and create pages?--[[User:Brandondorf9999|Brandondorf9999]] 18:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Highly suspicious users [[User:NancyRoan7678]] and [[User:MadieDelgado22]] just created pages with descriptions that make absolutely no sense («Darlena is the place where I'm called although it's not the most feminine of names.» «The favorite hobby for my children and me is in order to cook and Let me never stop doing it's.» ???) and it seems like they just created the users to spread possibly harmful external links. --[[User:SonicUnleashedPS2|SonicUnleashedPS2]] ([[User talk:SonicUnleashedPS2|talk]]) 21:01, 17 February 2024 (EST) | ||
| + | :Another one: [[User:AnnieSawers4393]], it's clearly a spamming/trolling/phishing scheme. --[[User:SonicUnleashedPS2|SonicUnleashedPS2]] ([[User talk:SonicUnleashedPS2|talk]]) 21:07, 17 February 2024 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:08, 17 February 2024
Your MD screenshots are distorted. Please check the screenshots page for info on taking clean shots. - Hivebrain 06:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit on that category
It was descriptive of why those organizations weren't on real life because no body co-founded them yet.--Brandondorf9999 16:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- I reverted it because the sentence you wrote made absolutely no sense, to be honest. Even now, the sentence you wrote above me is not...completely grammatically correct? Not to mention flow and word choice and...sigh. Also, not to be rude, but you need to stop adding "trivia" sections to the wiki pages. I know there are pages on here that have "trivia" sections, but most of those are old and refer to a stylistic choice that isn't as professional as this wiki should be trying to be.
- Any information that could be applied to a "trivia" section should instead be in the article proper, but in such a way that it actually flows and makes sense with the information around it. Then there's the question of whether or not the "trivia" is actually interesting enough to be mentioned. And if it's something that just can't be placed anywhere else, like with some of the random facts that are on the character pages, a "Miscellaneous" section seems slightly more professional.
- I don't want to kill your enthusiasm, because I know you're excited about doing whatever it is you're doing here. But maybe you should calm down just a bit and give some more thought as to what you're writing. David The Lurker 17:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oh and I'm supposed to be a member of Members instead of being just stuck on pending membership. Would you change my status to either like Oldbie or Members so that I can upload files and create pages?--Brandondorf9999 18:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Highly suspicious users User:NancyRoan7678 and User:MadieDelgado22 just created pages with descriptions that make absolutely no sense («Darlena is the place where I'm called although it's not the most feminine of names.» «The favorite hobby for my children and me is in order to cook and Let me never stop doing it's.» ???) and it seems like they just created the users to spread possibly harmful external links. --SonicUnleashedPS2 (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2024 (EST)
- Another one: User:AnnieSawers4393, it's clearly a spamming/trolling/phishing scheme. --SonicUnleashedPS2 (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2024 (EST)