Actions

Talk

Difference between revisions of "Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (16-bit)"

From Sonic Retro

(Page Title)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
:'''NOW''' there is. Before, there '''WASN'T'''. [[User:24.121.73.22|24.121.73.22]] [[User Talk: 24.121.73.22|My Talk Page]] 02:41, 10 September 2006 (CDT)
 
:'''NOW''' there is. Before, there '''WASN'T'''. [[User:24.121.73.22|24.121.73.22]] [[User Talk: 24.121.73.22|My Talk Page]] 02:41, 10 September 2006 (CDT)
 +
::...what? It's been there, according to the History file, since September 2004. -[[User:Scarred Sun|Scarred Sun]] 03:43, 10 September 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:43, 10 September 2006

Page Title

I think the page title should be "Sonic the Hedgehog 2", without the "16-bit", because there doesn't seem much point to making "Sonic the Hedgehog 2" a redirect. At the very least, "Sonic the Hedgehog 2" should be a disambiguation page. - Hivebrain 19:42, 26 August 2006 (CDT)

I think the pages should at least have the (16-bit) and (8-bit) monikers, for clarity/accuracy's sake; however, "Sonic the Hedgehog 2" and "Sonic 2" almost ALWAYS refer to the 16-bit version; I guess that links done with those names could be piped to have the 16-bit address and have those two be disambiguations? ETA: Perhaps not. Over 100 pages link to "Sonic the Hedgehog 2." --Scarred Sun 19:50, 26 August 2006 (CDT)
I also think it should be called "Sonic the Hedgehog 2", because it doesn't have an 8-bit article, so putting "16-bit" wouldn't make sense. I'm agreeing with Hivebrain. If it is the only Sonic 2 article, then change the page name! 24.121.73.22 My Talk Page 23:42, 9 September 2006 (CDT)
That's incorrect, though: there IS Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (8-bit). --Scarred Sun 02:11, 10 September 2006 (CDT)
NOW there is. Before, there WASN'T. 24.121.73.22 My Talk Page 02:41, 10 September 2006 (CDT)
...what? It's been there, according to the History file, since September 2004. -Scarred Sun 03:43, 10 September 2006 (CDT)