Sonic 1: WTF LAME

So are we allowing hacks that insult specific people now? I don't think a informational wiki is a place for a hack like this. It belongs on Sonic News Network or something. Hell, the joke is lost as the text scrolls to fast to read anyway. If this is allowed then will we allow people to post insults in peoples user pages?--MathUser 11:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Really, we all know the only reason you're bitching about this hack is because I was involved with it. I think we would all appreciate it if you quit this idiotic display of hating your fellow Retro members (and administrators) simply because they do stuff you don't like. ---GerbilSoft 22:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't think we should be creating pages to insult people. It don't have a place on a informational wiki. You might say it's ok cause it's true but that could be abused by people adding "faggot" into homosexual or bisexual member pages. Or sexist people could go into womens profiles and add bitch, dike etc.--MathUser 22:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

The hack's valid, the page stays. End of discussion. GW agrees with me, for what it's worth. Overlord 00:39, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

If the hack were directed at staff I bet that'd be another story. ScarredSun would never let a page of SS fails exist on the wiki.--MathUser 02:24, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

We get it, you hate my work. Stop throwing a tantrum and vandalizing the wiki. ---GerbilSoft 02:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

If you read my posts you'll notice I never mentioned hating your work. Also, if you are developing a series of insult hacks why shouldn't there be a category for it? Granted it takes you 3-4 years to release a new one but it will fill up eventually if they are allowed.--MathUser 03:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

MathUser, please leave the page as is. The discussion is over. --Guess Who 03:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

He is not developing a series of insult hacks. This was made specifically in response to Wetflame being banned (which happened... two years ago? three?), because many of his posts were just huge walls of text that either said nothing or propelled his narcissism. The staff wholeheartedly agreed with the thing at the time. There is no issue here; there is no plan to make a hack that attacks you, there is no plan to make a hack that attacks that one other news site, there is no plan at all. We're done here. - Andlabs 03:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Well, I gotta say one thing. The article shouldn't have a protected template and the stub template at the same time. The protected template states you cannot edit the page while the stub template asks you to edit it and even has a link to the edit page which will just lead to the source. If GerbilSoft insists on having a stub template on his page he should create a new template which don't reference editing the page. Obviously I can't cause I can't edit the page to put the template there anyway.--MathUser 03:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Page unprotected

I unprotected the page last night. However, if I see any deliberate vandalism, the user who committed said vandalism will be suspended for 24 hours. ---GerbilSoft 14:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

OK MathUser, STOP. You're being deliberately petty now. This has zero to do with this page and everything to do with you being irritated that a page you made was against the guidelines. Don't be a dumbass. Overlord 21:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

This page has always bugged me. I just wanted to discuss it again. And what is with GerbilSoft censoring talk pages for any pages he wants?--MathUser 21:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

"If that hack isn't notable, then how would this be notable on a wiki seeking legitimacy?"<-This is the post that GerbilSoft keeps deleting--21:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

If you want to discuss a hack's legitimacy, you can do so without deleting the page first. MainMemory 21:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

"keeps deleting" - he did it exactly once. For the record, I agree that line shoudln;t have been removed. Overlord 21:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

There are plenty of small hacks which merely add features from future games into older games. See: Fly with Tails in Sonic the Hedgehog 2, Homing attack and jumpdash in Sonic 2, Sonic 3D: No Flickies, Sonic CD Plus Plus, Super Sonic in Sonic 3D, Super Sonic in Sonic the Hedgehog, Tails in Sonic the Hedgehog, Knuckles the Echidna in Sonic the Hedgehog. This is why I felt the Boost in Sonic 2 hack belonged. Anyway, MainMemory himself gave me the link to his hack in the chat. It's too bad I don't have the chat logs anymore to prove it. You don't link stuff like that to wiki sysops unless you want it wikified.--MathUser 22:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Just because a hack is posted in IRC and you happen to be there does not mean I gave you specifically the link for you to put on the wiki. You do not have to put every ten-minute hack anyone's ever made on the wiki. MainMemory 22:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

I asked you for the link and you gave it to me, I don't know if you shared it with anyone else. But you were talking about the hack.--MathUser 22:12, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

I do not remember that happening, but if I had known it would lead to this, I wouldn't have given it to you. Perhaps I shall delete it from my website as well. MainMemory 22:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)